Bash (Unix shell)
Original author(s) | Brian Fox |
---|---|
Developer(s) | Chet Ramey |
Initial release | 8 June 1989 |
Stable release | 5.2.37[1]
/ 23 September 2024 |
Repository | |
Written in | C |
Operating system |
|
Platform | GNU |
Available in | Multilingual (gettext) |
Type | Shell (computing), Unix shell, command language |
License | Since 4.0: GPL-3.0-or-later, 1.11? to 3.2: GPL-2.0-or-later, 0.99? to 1.05?: GPL-1.0-or-later |
Website | www |
Bash, short for Bourne-Again SHell, is a shell program and command language supported by the Free Software Foundation[2] and first developed for the GNU Project[3] by Brian Fox.[4] Designed as a 100%[5] free software alternative for the Bourne shell,[6][7][8] it was initially released in 1989.[9] Its moniker is a play on words, referencing both its predecessor, the Bourne shell,[10] and the concept of rebirth.[11][12]
Since its inception, Bash has gained widespread adoption and is commonly used as the default login shell for numerous Linux distributions. It holds historical significance as one of the earliest programs ported to Linux by Linus Torvalds, alongside the GNU Compiler (GCC).[13] It is available on nearly all modern operating systems, making it a versatile tool in various computing environments.
As a command processor, Bash operates within a text window where users input commands to execute various tasks. It also supports the execution of commands from files, known as shell scripts, facilitating automation. In keeping with Unix shell conventions, Bash incorporates a rich set of features. The keywords, syntax, dynamically scoped variables, and other basic features of the language are all copied from the Bourne shell, sh
. Other features, e.g., history, are copied from the C shell, csh
, and the Korn Shell, ksh
. It is a POSIX-compliant shell with extensions.
History
[edit]It has been suggested that this section be merged with Bash (Unix shell)#Versions. (Discuss) Proposed since January 2025. |
While Bash was developed for UNIX and UNIX-like operating systems, such as GNU/Linux,[14] it is also available on Android, macOS, Windows, and numerous other current and historical operating systems. "Although there have been attempts to create specialized shells, the Bourne shell derivatives continue to be the primary shells in use."[15] Redirections began in Multics, also (wikipedia Multics page).
( Work in Progress )
[edit]It has been suggested that subsections of this section be split out into articles titled Unix Shell, Bourne shell and Thompson shell. (Discuss) (January 2025) |
1963
[edit]While at MIT developing for the CCTS operating system, Louis Pouzin wrote "'RUNCOM', a sort of shell driving the execution of command scripts, with argument substitution." He "felt that commands should be usable as building blocks for writing more commands, just like subroutine libraries."[16]
1964
[edit]Development began on MULTICS at MIT.
1965
[edit]This article contains too many or overly lengthy quotations. (January 2025) |
Louis Pouzin of MIT: "Christopher Strachey, a British scientist, had visited MIT about that time, and his macro-generator design appeared to me a very solid base for a command language, in particular the techniques for quoting and passing arguments. Without being invited on the subject, I wrote a paper explaining how the Multics command language could be designed with this objective. And I coined the word "shell" to name it."[16]
2 April 1965, MIT, "The SHELL, A Global Tool for Calling and Chaining Procedures in the System," by Louis Pouzin. Definition of a "command;" spaces as delimiters; first argument is always a command; other arguments are parameters passed to the command; comprehensive error codes; quoting literals including blanks; command search of HOME; user supplied executables including shell executables; parsing of arguments by the shell or by individual programs; each shell call is a separate child process; optional history of "stack", where full commandlines are stored; strays into kernel handling of processes; a QUIT signal; a DEBUG system; output memory of arbitrary, limited size; files as input; comma separating commandlines (as now in arithmetics); syncronous commands, user control suspended during command operation; a set of arguments defined as general conventions of the system; more as a command name; child process gets working copy of RO memory
"A command MUST be designed while keeping in mind the user, sitting at his console, wondering about what might be going on, mistyping or forgetting arguments, even if fully aware of the conventions, and possibly interfering with the command by hasty quits, ·carriage returns, and other temperamental reactions. ... And if some unexpected situation has occurred, the command must specify clearly what the user has to know for further action. Again, unlike a calling program, a user is not assigned once and for all a predetermined set of instructions. One does not know what he plans to do next, and he will eventually overlook some yet highly recommendable checking, if the command does not warn him against any possible misunderstanding as to what has been performed."
"We may envision a common procedure called automatically by the supervisor whenever a user types in some message at his console, at a time when he has no other process in active execution under console control (presently called command level). This procedure acts as an interface between console messages and subroutine. The purpose of such a procedure is to create a medium of exchange into which one could activate any procedure, ~ if _g ~ called~~ inside of another program. Hereafter, for simplification, w·e shall refer to that procedure as the SHELL"."
"The fact of being able to invoke all the tools available in the system, (as opposed to the only features of a particular monitor) provides a very high flexibility for chaining and inters?ersing tasks, and relieves from the handcuffs of the linear stream of control cards and associated data. The SHELL must not be seen as merely a console oriented tool, even though some parts of it are specifically console oriented~ As a point of fact the S}lliLL is first of all a general procedure-linking tool, and as such fits equally the batch-type process requirements, where no console is attached during execution."
"As a general policy, all system tools should keep the same rules as the-SHEU.. does with respect to meta-arguments. This would bring about a clean consistency, and a logical behavior among all procedures."
"It was modeled after the Multics shell, developed in 1965 by American software engineer Glenda Schroeder. Schroeder's Multics shell was itself modeled after the RUNCOM program Louis Pouzin showed to the Multics Team. The "rc" suffix on some Unix configuration files (for example, ".vimrc"), is a remnant of the RUNCOM ancestry of Unix shells."(Wikipedia page on UNIX Shells.)
1969
[edit]The MULTICS operating system was introduced as a collaboration between MIT, GE and Bell Labs. "It is also the first to have a command processor implemented as ordinary user code – an idea later used in the Unix shell."Multics Wikipage Some predecessor of the Thompson shell existed pre-1971 in MULTICS.[15]
AT&T began development on UNIX at Bell Labs, under proprietary licensing.
1971
[edit]"Ken Thompson (of Bell Labs) developed the first shell for UNIX called the 'V6 shell'." Its sole purpose was to serve as an interactive shell. It supported external commands called glob
, for pattern matching, and if
, for conditional expressions. "The shell introduced a compact syntax for redirection (<
>
and >>
) and piping (|
or ^
) that has survived into modern shells. You can also find support for invoking sequential commands (with ;
) and asynchronous commands (with &
)."[15] It also incorporated a goto command.
1973
[edit]UNIX, originally written by Ken Thompson, Dennis Ritchie, and Brian Kernighan among others, was released by AT&T (wikipedia UNIX page).
1977
[edit]The American National Standard Code for Information Interchange, or "ASCII," is published by the National Institute of Science and Technology, or "NIST,"as FIPS PUB 1-2.[17] The ASCII character set is still with us today as a core component of writing portable shell scripts.
"The Bourne shell was introduced.... Created by Stephen Bourne at AT&T Bell Labs for V7 UNIX, [it] remains a useful shell today (in some cases, as the default root shell)." "Bourne introduced control flows, loops, and variables into scripts, providing a more functional language to interact with the operating system (both interactively and noninteractively). The shell also permitted you to use shell scripts as filters, providing integrated support for handling signals, but lacked the ability to define functions. Finally, it incorporated a number of features we use today, including command substitution (using back quotes) and HERE documents to embed preserved string literals within a script."[15] It used the -eq, -ne, -lt style of test operators
The Korn Shell was introduced at around the same time as was the Bourne shell. It provides some features borrowed from Python and Ruby, such as associative arrays and floating point arithmetic, and aims to support the new POSIX standard.[15] Its features include the -ne test operator and `[...]` testing syntax, a "for ... in" command, `$((...))` arithmetic syntax, familiar positional parameter syntax, command substitution, and an alias command.
OpenVMS - Initial Release.[18] It included Bash at some later point.
1978
[edit]C shell - Initial release. Created by Bill Joy while he was at Berkeley, and released with 2BSD. "A useful feature introduced by Bill Joy in the C shell was command history. This feature maintained a history of the previously executed commands and allowed the user to review and easily select previous commands to execute. For example, typing the command history would show the previously executed commands. The up and down arrow keys could be used to select a command, or the previous command could be executed using !!. It's also possible to refer to arguments of the prior command; for example, !* refers to all arguments of the prior command, where !$ refers to the last argument of the prior command."[15] "csh, tcsh, zsh, ash, and scsh are all released under the BSD or a BSD-like license."
1983
[edit]The TENEX C shell "introduced file name and command completion in addition to command-line editing features. The tcsh was developed by Ken Greer at Carnegie Mellon University."[15] The shebang, or hashbang symbol was available in tcsh. Also, positional parameters as the argv array including argv[1], the $0 shell variable as argv[0], the Count of Indices parameter expansion $#var, the -d and -x operators of a testing syntax regarding directory and executability tests, respectively, the ! negate symbol, a looping construct in the foreach command, the set, echo and exit commands, variable assignment and arithmetic contexts "@ count = $count + 1", and familiar double quoting rules.
Novell NetWare - Initial release. It included Bash at some later point.
1984
[edit]"The IEEE POSIX work started in 1984 as an outgrowth of work initiated in the /usr/group organization to build a standard on the two variations of UNIX at the time - version 6 and BSD (Berkeley)."[19]
1986
[edit]The documents which would become known as "POSIX" started out as a trial use standard by the IEEE. By some it is considered a de facto standard.[20]
1988
[edit]10 January 1988 -- Brian Fox began coding Bash[21] after Richard Stallman became dissatisfied with the lack of progress being made by a prior developer.[7] Stallman and the FSF considered a free shell that could run existing shell scripts so strategic to a completely free system built from BSD and GNU code that this was one of the few projects they funded themselves. Fox undertook the work as an employee of FSF.[7][22]
"The first version of the IEEE Std 1003 was published in 1988 with the reference 'IEEE IX'," but these standards would not specify requirements for a "command interpreter," or "Shell and Utilities," until later. "At the suggestion of Richard Stallman, this was changed to POSIX for 'portable operating system interface'."[19][23] The POSIX "interface enables application writers to write portable applications -- it was developed with that goal in mind."[24]
1989
[edit]30 May 1989, Kenneth Almquist's ash shell - Initial release.[25]
8 June 1989, Fox released Bash as a beta, version 0.99.[9]. The license was GPL-1.0-or-later. "In addition to supporting backward-compatibility for scripting, Bash has incorporated features from the Korn and C shells. You'll find command history, command-line editing, a directory stack (pushd and popd), many useful environment variables, command completion, and more."[15] Eventually it supported "regular expressions (similar to Perl), and associative arrays."
1989 NOS, Microsoft/IBM DOS via the DJGPP project - Initial release.
1992
[edit]POSIX.2: Shell and Utilities (IEEE Std 1003.2-1992) was published.
Brian Fox remained the primary maintainer until sometime between mid-1992[26] and mid-1994.[27][28] His responsibility was then transitioned to another early contributor, Chet Ramey.[29][30][31][32][33] Since then, Bash has become the most popular default interactive shell among the major GNU/Linux distributions, such as Fedora, Debian, and openSUSE, as well as among their derivatives and competitors.[34][35]
1992
[edit]"The first eight entries in (POSIX) Portable Character Set are defined in the ISO/IEC 6429:1992 standard." They are null, alert, backspace, tab, carriage-return, newline, vertical-tab and form-feed.[36]
1994
[edit]26 January 1994 -- Debian - initial release. Bash is the default interactive and non-interactive shell.[37]
1995
[edit]Cygwin - Initial release.
BeOS - Initial release.[38][39]
1996
[edit]Chet Ramey released bash 2.0 on 31 December 1996. The license was GPL-2.0-or-later.
1997
[edit]bash 2.01 released.
Almquist shell, ash, ported from NetBSD to Debian by Herbert Xu.
1998
[edit]bash 2.02 released.
1998
[edit]MinGW (32-bit) - Initial release.
A group of Standards Committees from the IEEE, the Open Group and the ISO/IEC began working on the Single UNIX Specification v 3; they together became known as the Austin Group. A Technical Standard for Shell and Utilities was created in The Open Group Base Specifications, Issue 6, which is itself a part of the Single UNIX Specification v 3.[40] A focus of their work was to "collect into a single document" practices which had been proven to work in industry and academia while making "minimal changes to existing application code."[24]
1999
[edit]bash 2.03 released.
2000
[edit]bash 2.04 released.
The Korn shell is released as open source under the Common Public License.
"The rest of the characters" in the POSIX Portable Character Set "are defined in the ISO/IEC 10646-1:2000 standard." They comprise the remainder of the characters on a U.S. qwerty keyboard from <space> to <tilde>.[36]
BeOS - Final release
Darwin OS - Initial release. Bash is one of the available shells.[15]
2001
[edit]bash 2.05 released.
A POSIX-2001 Standard is published which includes a "Commands and Utilities" section. The Austin Group and the Single Unix Specification is involved.[40]
2002
[edit]September 2002 - In Debian, version 0.4.1 of ash was renamed to dash.
2003
[edit]Bash became the default shell on Apple's operating systems from OS X 10.3 Panther[42], though it was available on OS X 10.2 Jaguar as well.
A POSIX-2003 Shell and Utilities standard is published by the IEEE. "This is a component product standard for the mandatory shell and utilities related functionality;" a POSIX Certification Program exists.[43]
2004
[edit]bash 3.0 released.
POSIX-2004 is published.[44]
2005
[edit]bash 3.1 released.
Mingw-w64 and, less recently,
2006
[edit]bash 3.2 released. The license was GPL-2.0-or-later.
Ubuntu adopts dash as its default shell.
2008
[edit]POSIX-2008 is released by the IEEE. "This standard defines a standard source level interface to the shell and utility functionality required by application programs, including shell scripts."[43]
2009
[edit]bash 4.0 and 4.1 released. The licenses were GPL-3.0-or-later.
Novell Netware - final release
2011
[edit]bash 4.2 released
6 February 2011 -- Debian Lenny is released with Bash as its default interactive shell, and dash as its default non-interactive shell.[37] "Dash lacks many of the features one would expect in an interactive shell, which allows it to be faster and more memory efficient than Bash."
2013
[edit]POSIX-2013 is released by the IEEE.[45]
2014
[edit]bash 4.3 released
September 2014 -- ShellShock. Patches to fix the bugs were made available soon after the bugs were identified.
2015
[edit]Termux and other terminal emulation applications provide availability of Bash on Android.
2016
[edit]POSIX-2016 is released by the IEEE.[46]
bash 4.4 released.
Bash has been ported to Microsoft Windows via the Windows Subsystem for Linux[47][48] via
2017
[edit]A new version of the POSIX Standard is released.[43]
Some other current operating systems which carry Bash include and ArcaOS.[49]
2018
[edit]31 January 2018 -- The IEEE published the POSIX 2017 Standard.[50]
Apple packaged Bash as their default interactive shell through until macOS Mojave (c.2018). However, for explicit licensing reasons with Catalina[51] (c.2019), Apple replaced its default shell, Bash version 3.2 (c.2006), with Z Shell version 5.7 (c.2019).[52][53][54] "The bash binary bundled with macOS has been stuck on version 3.2 for a long time now. bash v4 was released in 2009 and bash v5 in January 2019. The reason Apple has not switched to these newer versions is that they are licensed with GPL v3. bash v3 is still GPL v2."[51] Zsh uses a more permissive license.
2019
[edit]bash 5.0 released
2020
[edit]With release 2020.4, Kali Linux switched to zsh as its default shell for desktop images, but its ARM, containers, NetHunter and WSL images still use Bash.[55]
bash 5.1 released
2022
[edit]bash 5.2 released
"At this point, 2022, a significant number of POSIX compatible or influenced systems exist in servers, cloud computing centers, high performance computers, Apple systems (initially BSD variations), and many cell phone systems. The number of devices measuring into the billions."[19]
2024
[edit]14 June 2024 -- POSIX-2024 is published by the IEEE.
bash 5.3 is released.
Features
[edit]List of Short Descriptions
[edit]As a command processor, Bash operates within a text window where users input commands to execute various tasks. It also supports the execution of commands from files, known as shell scripts, facilitating automation. In keeping with Unix shell conventions, Bash incorporates a rich set of features, including:
- A User Manual provided by the GNU Project, also available at
info bash
, and a technical manual available atman bash
. - Invocation as a...
- Interactive shell,
- Non-interactive shell, or
- Login shell;
- A command-line interface;
- Exit status codes;
- Control structures for
- Condition testing,
if
,case
,select
,- logical AND (
&&
) and OR (||
), and
- Iteration:
for
,while
,until
loops, and- Arithmetic C-style loop:
for ((
;
- Condition testing,
- Syntaxes for Boolean testing of file attributes, string and integer values, etc.:
- Traditional
test
command, - Traditional single bracket test:
[
, - Modern double bracket test:
[[ ... ]]
, which includes advanced features:- Extended regular expression and extglob matching
- Lexicographic sorting with
<
and>
;
- Traditional
- UNIX-style pipelines:
|
; - Subshells:
( ... )
; - Signaling as a means of inter-process communication using the
trap
builtin; - Asynchronous execution, i.e., Jobs and job control:
job_spec &
wherejob_spec
can be one of:- A full commandline:
<command_name> <options> <operands> <arguments> &
, or - A job control identifier as denoted by a leading percent symbol:
%1 &
;
- A full commandline:
- A shell portability mode where command lines can be interpreted in conformance with the POSIX standard;
- Command parsing:
- Comments are ignored:
- Bourne-style
#
hashtag comments, and - Thompson-style
:
colon comments;
- Bourne-style
- Commands are parsed one line at a time:
- Control structures are honored, and
- Backslash
\
escapes are also honored at the ends of lines;
- Split into words (i.e., word splitting) according to quoting rules,
- Including ANSI-C quoting
$'...'
;
- Including ANSI-C quoting
- Seven kinds of expansions are performed in the following order on the resulting string:
- (Step 1) Brace expansion
kernel{-headers}
, - (Step 2) Tilde expansion
~
, - (Step 3) In a left-to-right fashion:
- Parameter and variable expansion
$foo
or${bar}
, including- Dynamically scoped variables,
- Indexed arrays of unlimited size,
- Associative arrays via
declare -A
, and - Expansion syntaxes which can perform some tasks more quickly than external utilities, including, among others:
- Pattern Substitution
${foo//x/y}
forsed 's/x/y/g'
,
- Remove Matching Prefix or Suffix Pattern
${bar##[a-zA-Z0-9]*}
forcut -c8-
,
- Print Array Keys
${!array[@]}
, and
- Display Error if Null or Unset
${var:?error message}
,
- Pattern Substitution
- Command substitution:
$( ... )
, - Process substitution,
<()
or>()
, when a system supports it: - Arithmetic expansion,
(( ... ))
or$(( ... ))
, including- Integer arithmetic in any base from two to sixty-four, although
- Floating-point arithmetic is not available from within the shell itself (for this functionality, see current versions of
bc
andawk
, among others),
- Parameter and variable expansion
- (Step 4) Word splitting (again),
- (Step 5) Pathname expansion, i.e., shell-style globbing and pattern matching using
*
,?
,[...]
, and- (Although they can be used in conjunction, the use of brackets in pattern matching,
[...]
, and the use of brackets in the testing commands,[
and[[ ... ]]
, are each one different things.)
- (Although they can be used in conjunction, the use of brackets in pattern matching,
- Quote removal;
- (Step 1) Brace expansion
- Redirections of Standard Input, Standard Output and Standard Error data streams are performed, including
- File writing,
>
, and appending,>>
, - Here documents,
<<
, - Here strings,
<<<
, which allow parameters to be used as input, and - A redirection operator,
>|
, which can force overwriting of a file when a shell's "noclobber" setting is enabled;
- File writing,
- Command name lookup is performed, in the following order:
- Commands internal to the shell:
- Shell aliases,
- Shell reserved words,
- Shell functions, and
- Shell built-in commands;
- Commands external to the shell:
- Separate UNIX-style programs such as
ls
orln
, and - Shell scripts, which are files containing executable commands. (Shell scripts do not require compilation before execution and, when certain requirements are met, can be invoked as commands by using their filename.)
- Separate UNIX-style programs such as
- Commands internal to the shell:
- The resulting string is executed as a command.
- Comments are ignored:
Bash also offers...
- Configurable execution environment(s):[56]
- Settings (
set
built-in) and shell options (shopt
built-in) which alter shell behavior; - With interactive invocation only,
- Unlimited size command history,
- A directory stack (see
pushd
andpopd
built-ins), - Tab completion,
- Configurable prompts, and
- Command line editing with GNU readline;
- Lightweight logging for debugging purposes (xtrace), and other lightweight debugging options (errexit, noexec, nounset, pipefail, etc.);
- Shell compatibility modes: bash 5.1 can operate as if it were bash 4.2, etc.;
- Documentation:
- Informal avenues of support via:
- IRC at libera.chat #bash
- Mailing lists at https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/
General Discussion
[edit]The Bash command syntax is a superset of the Bourne shell command syntax. Bash supports brace expansion,[57] command line completion (Programmable Completion),[58] basic debugging[59][60] and signal handling (using trap
) since bash 2.05a[61][62] among other features. Bash can execute the vast majority of Bourne shell scripts without modification, with the exception of Bourne shell scripts stumbling into fringe syntax behavior interpreted differently in Bash or attempting to run a system command matching a newer Bash builtin, etc. Bash command syntax includes ideas drawn from the Korn Shell (ksh) and the C shell (csh) such as command line editing, command history (history
command),[63] the directory stack, the $RANDOM
and $PPID
variables, and POSIX command substitution syntax $(...)
.
When a user presses the tab key within an interactive command-shell, Bash automatically uses command line completion, since beta version 2.04,[64] to match partly typed program names, filenames and variable names. The Bash command-line completion system is very flexible and customizable, and is often packaged with functions that complete arguments and filenames for specific programs and tasks.
Bash's syntax has many extensions lacking in the Bourne shell. Bash can perform integer calculations ("arithmetic evaluation") without spawning external processes. It uses the ((...))
command and the $((...))
variable syntax for this purpose. Its syntax simplifies I/O redirection. For example, it can redirect standard output (stdout) and standard error (stderr) at the same time using the &>
operator. This is simpler to type than the Bourne shell equivalent 'command > file 2>&1
'. Bash supports process substitution using the <(command)
and >(command)
syntax, which substitutes the output of (or input to) a command where a filename is normally used. (This is implemented through /proc/fd/ unnamed pipes on systems that support that, or via temporary named pipes where necessary).
When using the 'function' keyword, Bash function declarations are not compatible with Bourne/Korn/POSIX scripts (the KornShell has the same problem when using 'function'), but Bash accepts the same function declaration syntax as the Bourne and Korn shells, and is POSIX-conformant. Because of these and other differences, Bash shell scripts are rarely runnable under the Bourne or Korn shell interpreters unless deliberately written with that compatibility in mind, which is becoming less common as Linux becomes more widespread. But in POSIX mode, Bash conforms with POSIX more closely.[65]
Bash supports here documents. Since version 2.05b Bash can redirect standard input (stdin) from a "here string" using the <<<
operator.
Bash 3.0 supports in-process regular expression matching using a syntax reminiscent of Perl.[66]
In February 2009,[67] Bash 4.0 introduced support for associative arrays.[68] Associative array indices are strings, in a manner similar to AWK or Tcl.[69] They can be used to emulate multidimensional arrays. Bash 4 also switches its license to GPL-3.0-or-later.[70][71]
Brace expansion
[edit]Brace expansion, also called alternation, is a feature copied from the C shell. It generates a set of alternative combinations. Generated results need not exist as files. The results of each expanded string are not sorted and left to right order is preserved:
$ echo a{p,c,d,b}e
ape ace ade abe
$ echo {a,b,c}{d,e,f}
ad ae af bd be bf cd ce cf
Users should not use brace expansions in portable shell scripts, because the Bourne shell does not produce the same output.
$ # bash shell
$/bin/bash -c 'echo a{p,c,d,b}e'
ape ace ade abe
$ # A traditional shell does not produce the same output
$ /bin/sh -c 'echo a{p,c,d,b}e'
a{p,c,d,b}e
When brace expansion is combined with wildcards, the braces are expanded first, and then the resulting wildcards are substituted normally. Hence, a listing of JPEG and PNG images in the current directory could be obtained using:
ls *.{jpg,jpeg,png} # expands to *.jpg *.jpeg *.png - after which,
# the wildcards are processed
echo *.{png,jp{e,}g} # echo just shows the expansions -
# and braces in braces are possible.
In addition to alternation, brace expansion can be used for sequential ranges between two integers or characters separated by double dots. Newer versions of Bash allow a third integer to specify the increment.
$ echo {1..10}
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
$ echo {01..10}
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
$ echo file{1..4}.txt
file1.txt file2.txt file3.txt file4.txt
$ echo {a..e}
a b c d e
$ echo {1..10..3}
1 4 7 10
$ echo {a..j..3}
a d g j
When brace expansion is combined with variable expansion (A.K.A. parameter expansion and parameter substitution) the variable expansion is performed after the brace expansion, which in some cases may necessitate the use of the eval
built-in, thus:
$ start=1; end=10
$ echo {$start..$end} # fails to expand due to the evaluation order
{1..10}
$ eval echo {$start..$end} # variable expansion occurs then resulting string is evaluated
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Startup scripts
[edit]This section contains instructions, advice, or how-to content. (January 2019) |
When Bash starts, it executes the commands in a variety of dot files. Unlike Bash shell scripts, dot files do typically have neither the execute permission enabled nor an interpreter directive like #!/bin/bash
.
Legacy-compatible Bash startup example
[edit]The example ~/.bash_profile
below is compatible with the Bourne shell and gives semantics similar to csh for the ~/.bashrc
and ~/.bash_login
. The [ -r filename ] && cmd
is a short-circuit evaluation that tests if filename exists and is readable, skipping the part after the &&
if it is not.
[ -r ~/.profile ] && . ~/.profile # set up environment, once, Bourne-sh syntax only
if [ -n "$PS1" ] ; then # are we interactive?
[ -r ~/.bashrc ] && . ~/.bashrc # tty/prompt/function setup for interactive shells
[ -r ~/.bash_login ] && . ~/.bash_login # any at-login tasks for login shell only
fi # End of "if" block
Operating system issues in Bash startup
[edit]Some versions of Unix and Linux contain Bash system startup scripts, generally under the /etc
directory. Bash executes these files as part of its standard initialization, but other startup files can read them in a different order than the documented Bash startup sequence. The default content of the root user's files may also have issues, as well as the skeleton files the system provides to new user accounts upon setup. The startup scripts that launch the X window system may also do surprising things with the user's Bash startup scripts in an attempt to set up user-environment variables before launching the window manager. These issues can often be addressed using a ~/.xsession
or ~/.xprofile
file to read the ~/.profile
— which provides the environment variables that Bash shell windows spawned from the window manager need, such as xterm or Gnome Terminal.
Portability
[edit]Invoking Bash with the --posix
option or stating set -o posix
in a script causes Bash to conform very closely with the POSIX 1003.2 standard.[72] Bash shell scripts intended for portability should take into account at least the POSIX shell standard. Some bash features not found in POSIX are:[72][73]
- Certain extended invocation options
- Brace expansion
- Arrays and associative arrays
- The double bracket
[[...]]
extended test construct and its regex matching - The double-parentheses arithmetic-evaluation construct (only
(( ... ))
;$(( ... ))
is POSIX) - Certain string-manipulation operations in parameter expansion
local
for scoped variables- Process substitution
- Bash-specific builtins
- Coprocesses
- $EPOCHSECONDS and $EPOCHREALTIME variables[74]
If a piece of code uses such a feature, it is called a "bashism" – a problem for portable use. Debian's checkbashisms
and Vidar Holen's shellcheck
can be used to make sure that a script does not contain these parts.[75][76] The list varies depending on the actual target shell: Debian's policy allows some extensions in their scripts (as they are in the dash shell),[73] while a script intending to support pre-POSIX Bourne shells, like autoconf's configure
, are even more limited in the features they can use.[77]
Keyboard shortcuts
[edit]Bash uses GNU Readline to provide keyboard shortcuts for command line editing using the default ( Emacs ) key bindings. Vi-bindings can be enabled by running set -o vi
.[78]
Process management (Job control)
[edit]The Bash shell has two modes of execution for commands: batch (asynchronous), and concurrent (synchronous).
To execute commands in batch mode (i.e., in sequence) they must be separated by the character ";", or on separate lines:
command1; command2
command3
In this example, when command1 is finished, command2 is executed, and when command2 has completed, command3 will execute.
A background execution of command1 can occur using (symbol &) at the end of an execution command, and process will be executed in background while immediately returning control to the shell and allowing continued execution of commands.
command1 &
Or to have a concurrent execution of command1 and command2, they must be executed in the Bash shell in the following way:
command1 & command2
In this case command1 is executed in the background & symbol, returning immediately control to the shell that executes command2 in the foreground.
A process can be stopped and control returned to bash by typing Ctrl+z while the process is running in the foreground.[79]
A list of all processes, both in the background and stopped, can be achieved by running jobs
:
$ jobs
[1]- Running command1 &
[2]+ Stopped command2
In the output, the number in brackets refers to the job id. The plus sign signifies the default process for bg
and fg
. The text "Running" and "Stopped" refer to the process state. The last string is the command that started the process.
The state of a process can be changed using various commands. The fg
command brings a process to the foreground, while bg
sets a stopped process running in the background. bg
and fg
can take a job id as their first argument, to specify the process to act on. Without one, they use the default process, identified by a plus sign in the output of jobs
. The kill
command can be used to end a process prematurely, by sending it a signal. The job id must be specified after a percent sign:
kill %1
Conditional execution
[edit]Bash supplies "conditional execution" command separators that make execution of a command contingent on the exit code set by a precedent command. For example:
cd "$SOMEWHERE" && ./do_something || echo "An error occurred" >&2
Where ./do_something is only executed if the cd (change directory) command was "successful" (returned an exit status of zero) and the echo command would only be executed if either the cd or the ./do_something command return an "error" (non-zero exit status).
For all commands the exit status is stored in the special variable $?
. Bash also supports if ...;then ...;else ...;fi
and case $VARIABLE in $pattern)...;;$other_pattern)...;; esac
forms of conditional command evaluation.
Programmable completion
[edit]Bash supports programmable completion via built-in complete
, compopt
, and compgen
commands.[80] The feature has been available since the beta version of 2.04 released in 2000.[81][82] These commands enable complex and intelligent completion specification for commands (i.e. installed programs), functions, variables, and filenames.[83]
The complete
and compopt
two commands specify how arguments of some available commands or options are going to be listed in the readline input. As of version 5.1 completion of the command or the option is usually activated by the Tab ↹ keystroke after typing its name.[83]
Documentation
[edit]As the standard upon which bash is based, the POSIX Standard, or IEEE Std 1003.1,[84] et seq, is especially informative.
The Linux "man page"[85][86] is intended to be the authoritative explanatory technical document for the understanding of how bash
operates. It is usually available by running man bash
.
The GNU manual is sometimes considered more user-friendly for reading. "You may also find information about Bash by running info bash
... or by looking at /usr/share/doc/bash/
, /usr/local/share/doc/bash/
, or similar directories on your system. A brief summary is available by running bash --help.[87]"
On modern Linuxes, information on shell built-in commands can be found by executing help,
help [built-in name]
or man builtins
at a terminal prompt where bash is installed. Some commands, such as echo
, false
, kill
, printf
, test
or true
, depending on your system and on your locally installed version of bash, can refer to either a shell built-in or a system binary executable file. When one of these command name collisions occurs, bash will by default execute a given command line using the shell built-in. Specifying a binary executable's absolute path (i.e., /bin/printf
) is one way of ensuring that the shell uses a system binary. This name collision issue also effects any "help summaries" viewed with kill --help
and /bin/kill --help
. Shell built-ins and system binary executable files of the same name often have differing options.
"The project maintainer also has a Bash page which includes Frequently Asked Questions",[88][89][87] this FAQ is current as of bash version 5.1 and is no longer updated.
Security and Vulnerabilities
[edit]Root Scripts
[edit]Running any shell scripts as the root user has, for years, been widely criticized as poor security practice. One commonly given reason is that, when a script is executed as root, the negative effects of any bugs in a script would be magnified by root's elevated privileges.
One common example: a script contains the command, rm -rf ${dir}/
, but the variable $dir
is left undefined. In Linux, if the script was executed by a regular user, the shell would attempt to execute the command rm -rf /
as a regular user, and the command would fail. However, if the script was executed by the root user, then the command would likely succeed and the filesystem would be erased.
It is recommended to use sudo
on a per-command basis instead.
Debugging
[edit]This list (which may have dates, numbers, etc.) may be better in a sortable table format. (January 2025) |
- Shell features specified by POSIX:
- Parameter Expansions:[90][91][92]
${parameter:?[word]}
: "Indicate Error if Null or Unset, where the expansion of[word]
, perhaps an error message or a line number, is written to STDERR and the shell exits with a non-zero exit code."
- Special Parameters:[93][94]
$?
"Expands to the shortest representation of the decimal exit status."$$
"Expands to the shortest representation of the decimal process ID of the invoked shell."
- Special Built-In Utility
set
:[95][96][97]set -x
, or XTrace, is the shell's primary means of debugging. It "writes to standard error a trace for each command after it expands the command and before it executes it."set -v
, or Verbose mode, "writes its input to standard error as it is read."set -o pipefail
: "Derive the exit status of a pipeline from the exit statuses of all of the commands in the pipeline, not just the last (rightmost) command."set -u
, or NoUnset, when enabled, will cause the shell to exit with an error message when it encounters an unset variable expansion. Its use has a number of counter-intuitive pitfalls.set -e
, or ErrExit, is a setting that, when enabled, will, under certain very specific conditions, cause the shell to exit without an error message whenever the shell receives a non-zero exit code. Its use is somewhat controversial, to the extent that any somewhat obscure computer program can be considered controversial. Adherents claim that ErrExit provides an assurance of verifiability in situations where shell scripts "must not fail." However, opponents claim that its use is unreliable, deceptively simple, highly counter-intuitive, rife with gotchas and pitfalls, and in essence "security theater." Numerous developers of Bash have strongly discouraged the use of this particular setting.
- Special Built-In Utility
trap [-lp] [arg] [sigspec …]
: [98][96]:- EXIT, : "If a
[sigspec]
(signal specifier) is 0 or EXIT,[arg]
is executed when the shell exits."
- EXIT, : "If a
- Utility
printf
: a means of reliably printing the contents of a variable:
- Parameter Expansions:[90][91][92]
- Bash features not specified by POSIX:
- Bash Variables:[99][100]
$BASHPID
:[101] "Expands to the process ID of the current bash process."${BASH_ARGC[@]}
:[102] "An array variable whose values are the number of parameters in each frame of the current bash execution call stack."${BASH_ARGV[@]}
:[103] "An array variable containing all of the parameters in the current bash execution call stack."${BASH_LINENO[@]}
:[104] "An array variable whose members are the line numbers in source files where each corresponding member of FUNCNAME was invoked."${BASH_REMATCH[@]}
:[105] "An array variable whose members are assigned by the =~ binary operator to the [[ conditional command."$BASH_SOURCE
:[106] "An array variable whose members are the source filenames where the corresponding shell function names in the FUNCNAME array variable are defined."$BASH_XTRACEFD
:[107] "If set to an integer corresponding to a valid file descriptor, Bash will write the trace output generated when ‘set -x’ is enabled to that file descriptor."$EPOCHREALTIME
:[108] "Each time this parameter is referenced, it expands to the number of seconds since the Unix Epoch (see time(3)) as a floating point value with micro-second granularity."${FUNCNAME[@]}
:[109] "An array variable containing the names of all shell functions currently in the execution call stack."$LINENO
:[110] "Each time this parameter is referenced, the shell substitutes a decimal number representing the current sequential line number (starting with 1) within a script or function."${PIPESTATUS[@]}
:[111] "An array variable containing a list of exit status values from the processes in the most-recently-executed foreground pipeline (which may contain only a single command)."$PPID
:[112] "The process ID of the shell's parent."$PS4
:[113] "The value of this parameter is expanded as with PS1 and the value is printed before each command bash displays during an execution trace."
- Shell Builtin
set
:[95][96][97]set -r
, or Restricted mode, is intended to improve the security of an individual shell instance from a malicious human with physical access to a machine. As threat models have changed, it has become less commonly used now than it once was.
- Shell Builtin
shopt
:[114][96]shopt -s extdebug
: "Behavior intended for use by debuggers."
- Shell Builtin
trap [-lp] [arg] [sigspec …]
:[98][96]: While POSIX does specify certain uses of thetrap
builtin, the following signal specs are Bash extensions.- DEBUG: "If a sigspec is DEBUG, the command arg is executed before" certain kinds of commands.
- ERR: "If a sigspec is ERR, the command arg is executed whenever..." certain kinds of commands "return a non-zero exit status," subject to similar restrictions as with ErrExit.
- RETURN: "If a sigspec is RETURN, the command arg is executed each time a shell function or a script executed with the
.
orsource
builtins finishes executing."
- Bash Variables:[99][100]
- Third party debugging utilities:
Examples
[edit]With the :?
parameter expansion, an unset or null variable can halt a script.
- ex.sh
#!/bin/bash bar="foo is not defined" echo "${foo:?$bar}" echo this message doesn't print
$ ./ex.sh ./ex.sh: line 3: foo: foo is not defined
Reliably printing the contents of an array that contains spaces and newlines first in a portable syntax, and then the same thing in Bash. Note that in Bash, the number of spaces before the newline is made clear.
$ # In POSIX shell: $ array=( "a " " b" " > c " ) $ printf ',%s,\n' "${array[@]}" ,a , , b, , c ,
# In Bash: declare -p array declare -a array=([0]="a " [1]=" b" [2]=$' \n c ')
Printing an error message when there's a problem.
- error.sh
if ! lsblk | grep sdb then echo Error, line $LINENO fi
$ ./error.sh Error, line 130
Using xtrace. If errexit had been enabled, then echo quux
would not have been executed.
- test.sh
#!/bin/bash set -x foo=bar; echo $foo false echo quux
$ ./test.sh + foo=bar + echo bar bar + false + echo quux quux
Deprecated syntax
[edit]- Back-tick style command substitutions:
`...`
is deprecated in favor of$(...)
;
- Use of -a or -o in
test
/[
/[[
commands,- for example,
[ -r ./file -a ! -l ./file ]
is deprecated in favor of[ -r ./file ] && ! [ -l ./file ]
;
- for example,
- Use of the arithmetic syntax
$[...]
is deprecated in favor of$((...))
or((...))
, as appropriate;
- Any uses of
expr
orlet
.
Shellshock
[edit]In September of 2014, a security bug was discovered[121] in the program. It was dubbed "Shellshock." Public disclosure quickly led to a range of attacks across the Internet.[122][123][124]
Exploitation of the vulnerability could enable arbitrary code execution in CGI scripts executable by certain versions of Bash. The bug involved how Bash passed function definitions to subshells through environment variables.[125] The bug had been present in the source code since August 1989 (version 1.03)[126] and was patched in September 2014 (version 4.3).
Patches to fix the bugs were made available soon after the bugs were identified. Upgrading to a current version is strongly advised.
It was assigned the Common Vulnerability identifiers CVE-2014-6271, CVE-2014-6277 and CVE-2014-7169, among others. Under CVSS Metrics 2.x and 3.x, the bug is regarded as "high" and "critical," respectively.
Bug reporting
[edit]An external command called bashbug reports Bash shell bugs. When the command is invoked, it brings up the user's default editor with a form to fill in. The form is mailed to the Bash maintainers (or optionally to other email addresses).[127][128]
Versions
[edit]It has been suggested that this section be merged with Bash (Unix shell)#History. (Discuss) Proposed since January 2025. |
A version is also available for Windows 10 and Windows 11 via the Windows Subsystem for Linux.[129][130] It is also the default user shell in Solaris 11.[131] Bash was also the default shell in BeOS,[38] and in versions of Apple macOS from 10.3 (originally, the default shell was tcsh) to 10.15 (macOS Catalina), which changed the default shell to zsh,[54] although Bash remains available as an alternative shell.[71]
Release history
[edit]Version | Release date | Release notes |
---|---|---|
bash-5.2.15 | 2022-12-13 | NEWS |
bash-5.2 | 2022-09-26 | |
bash-5.1 | 2020-12-07 | github version history NEWS[68] |
bash-5.0 | 2019-01-07 | [132][133][134] |
bash-5.0-rc1 | 2018-12-20 | |
bash-5.0-beta2 | 2018-11-28 | |
bash-5.0-beta | 2018-09-17 | |
bash-5.0-alpha | 2018-05-22 | |
bash-4.4 | 2016-09-15 | github version history NEWS v4.4 |
bash-4.4-rc2 | 2016-08-22 | |
bash-4.4-rc1 | 2016-02-24 | |
bash-4.4-beta2 | 2016-07-11 | |
bash-4.4-beta | 2015-10-12 | |
bash-4.3 | 2014-02-26 | |
bash-4.2 | 2011-02-13 | |
bash-4.1 | 2009-12-31 | |
bash-4.0 | 2009-02-20 | |
bash-4.0-rc1 | 2009-01-12 | |
bash-3.2 | 2006-10-11 | |
bash-3.1 | 2005-12-08 | |
bash-3.0 | 2004-08-03 | |
bash-2.05b | 2002-07-17 | |
bash-2.05a | 2001-11-16 | |
bash-2.05 | 2001-04-09 | |
bash-2.04 | 2000-03-21 | |
bash-2.03 | 1999-02-19 | |
bash-2.02 | 1998-04-18 | |
bash-2.01 | 1997-06-05 | |
bash-2.0 | 1996-12-31 |
Licensing
[edit]Since 4.0: GPL-3.0-or-later[135]
1.11? to 3.2: GPL-2.0-or-later[136]
0.99? to 1.05?: GPL-1.0-or-later[137][68][138]
Program name
[edit]This section possibly contains original research. (May 2024) |
The program's name is a figure of speech or witticism which begins with an homage to Stephen Bourne, the creator of one of the shell programs which have sometimes been considered superseded by the bash shell. His name is used as a pun on the image of childbirth. With that pun, it would seem, is added an allusion: possibly to the Hindu or Buddhist idea of reincarnation; possibly to the Christian idiom known as "being born again;" or quite possibly just to the more abstract idea of renewal. While numerous English translations of the Christian New Testament, Book of John, chapter 3 do contain the words "born again," Merriam-Webster's dictionary has "born-again" defined as a "...person who has made a renewed or confirmed commitment....[139]" Whatever the original touchstone may have been, in the end the program received the name, "the Bourne Again SHell."[87][140]
The acronym of that name then is "bash," a word meaning "to strike violently.[141]" In the context of computer programming, to "violently hit something," such as a computer keyboard, could be considered a hyperbolic image of some frustration. Such imagery of negative emotionality could be seen as standing in direct juxtaposition to the idea of becoming "born again."
The naming could be considered an instance of verbal irony[142] or accidental innuendo.[143] Bash grammar was initially based on the grammars of the most popular Unix shell programs then currently in use, some of which were considered particularly difficult to use or frustrating at that time. As the years progressed, bash development has made its grammar more user-friendly,[144][145][146][147][148][149] so much so that it seems likely that the bash project has been committed to improving its usability. Since then, bash has become the de facto default shell program in most Linux and Unix operating systems.
See also
[edit]Unix Shells
[edit]- Almquist shell (ash)
- Bourne shell (sh)
- BusyBox
- C shell (csh)
- Debian-Almquist Shell (dash)
- Fish shell: Friendly Interactive Shell
- Google Shell (goosh) - a UNIX-like front-end for Google Search.
- Korn shell (ksh), of which there are numerous variations.
- nsh - "A command-line shell like fish, but POSIX compatible;" available on Arch.[150]
- osh - "Oil Shell is a Bash-compatible UNIX command-line shell;" available on Arch.
- Mashey or Programmer's Workbench shell
- Qshell for IBM i
- rc from Plan 9
- rush - Restricted User Shell, available on Debian.[37]
- Stand-alone shell (sash)
- scsh - The Scheme Shell.
- TENEX C shell (tcsh)
- Thompson shell (tsh)
- Toybox
- yash - Yet Another Shell, aims "to be the most POSIX-compliant shell in the world;" available on Arch.
- Z shell (zsh)
References
[edit]- ^ "Index of /gnu/bash". Retrieved 4 December 2024.
- ^
"Free Software Foundation — working together for free software — Front Page". fsf.org. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is a nonprofit with a worldwide mission to promote computer user freedom.
- ^
"GNU in a Nutshell". gnu.org. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
The ultimate goal is to provide free software to do all of the jobs computer users want to do—and thus make proprietary software a thing of the past.
- ^
"GNU's Bulletin, vol. 1 no. 7, June, 1989 :: GNU's Who". gnu.org. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
Brian Fox has now completed GNU's version of sh, called BASH, the `Bourne Again SHell'.
- ^
"GNU Software". gnu.org. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
GNU is an operating system which is 100% free software.
- ^
"Bourne shell". ibm.com. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
The Bourne shell is an interactive command interpreter and command programming language.
- ^ a b c
Richard Stallman (forwarded with comments by Chet Ramey) (10 February 1988). "GNU + BSD = ?". Newsgroup: comp.unix.questions. Usenet: 2362@mandrill.CWRU.Edu. Archived from the original on 28 December 2021. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
For a year and a half, the GNU shell was "just about done". The author made repeated promises to deliver what he had done, and never kept them. Finally I could no longer believe he would ever deliver anything. So Foundation staff member Brian Fox is now implementing an imitation of the Bourne shell.
- ^
Hamilton, Naomi (30 May 2008), "The A-Z of Programming Languages: BASH/Bourne-Again Shell", Computerworld: 2, archived from the original on 6 July 2011, retrieved 21 March 2011,
When Richard Stallman decided to create a full replacement for the then-encumbered Unix systems, he knew that he would eventually have to have replacements for all of the common utilities, especially the standard shell, and those replacements would have to have acceptable licensing.
NOTE: Original computerworld.com.au link is dead: see also copies of original material at - ^ a b Brian Fox (forwarded by Leonard H. Tower Jr.) (8 June 1989). "Bash is in beta release!". Newsgroup: gnu.announce. Archived from the original on 4 May 2013. Retrieved 28 October 2010.
- ^ "I Almost Get a Linux Editor and Compiler". Dr. Dobb's. Archived from the original on 2 March 2021. Retrieved 12 September 2020.
- ^
Richard Stallman (12 November 2010). "About the GNU Project". Free Software Foundation. Archived from the original on 24 April 2011. Retrieved 13 March 2011.
"Bourne Again Shell" is a play on the name Bourne Shell, which was the usual shell on Unix.
- ^
Gattol, Markus (13 March 2011), Bourne-again Shell, archived from the original on 9 March 2011, retrieved 13 March 2011,
The name is a pun on the name of the Bourne shell (sh), an early and important Unix shell written by Stephen Bourne and distributed with Version 7 Unix circa 1978, and the concept of being "born again".
- ^
Torvalds, Linus Benedict (August 1991). "comp.os.minix". Retrieved 6 September 2009.
I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work.
- ^ "Bash FAQ, version 4.14". Archived from the original on September 1, 2018. Retrieved April 9, 2016.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i IBM, Linux Shells
- ^ a b Louis Pouzin, Multicians, Origin of the Shell
- ^ NIST, ASCII Publication, PDF c1977
- ^ "Installing the new GNU packages". Archived from the original on 3 October 2020. Retrieved 4 September 2020.
- ^ a b c POSIX Impact
- ^ Usenix ';login:' Feb 2007
- ^
Brian Fox (29 August 1996), shell.c, Free Software Foundation, archived from the original on 28 September 2018, retrieved 1 November 2010,
Birthdate: Sunday, January 10th, 1988. Initial author: Brian Fox
- ^
Richard Stallman (3 October 2010). "About the GNU Project". Free Software Foundation. Archived from the original on 24 April 2011. Retrieved 21 March 2011.
Free Software Foundation employees have written and maintained a number of GNU software packages. Two notable ones are the C library and the shell. ... We funded development of these programs because the GNU Project was not just about tools or a development environment. Our goal was a complete operating system, and these programs were needed for that goal.
- ^ stallman.org POSIX
- ^ a b POSIX Backgrounder
- ^ Mascheck, Ash Variants
- ^ len (g...@prep.ai.mit.edu) (20 April 1993). "January 1993 GNU's Bulletin". Newsgroup: gnu.announce. Usenet: gnusenet930421bulletin@prep.ai.mit.edu. Archived from the original on 2 March 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2010.
- ^ Ramey, Chet (1 August 1994). "Bash - the GNU shell (Reflections and Lessons Learned)". Linux Journal. Archived from the original on 5 December 2008. Retrieved 13 November 2008.
- ^ Chet Ramey (31 October 2010), Dates in your Computerworld interview, archived from the original on 20 July 2012, retrieved 31 October 2010
- ^ Hamilton, Naomi (30 March 2008). "The A-Z of Programming Languages: BASH/Bourne-Again Shell". Computerworld. Archived from the original on 8 November 2016. Retrieved 1 March 2022.
- ^ Ramey, Chet (20 April 2021). "The GNU Bourne-Again Shell". Technology Infrastructure Services. Case Western Reserve University. Retrieved 1 March 2022.
- ^ Chet Ramey (12 June 1989). "Bash 0.99 fixes & improvements". Newsgroup: gnu.bash.bug. Archived from the original on 10 November 2012. Retrieved 1 November 2010.
- ^ Chet Ramey (24 July 1989). "Some bash-1.02 fixes". Newsgroup: gnu.bash.bug. Archived from the original on 10 November 2012. Retrieved 30 October 2010.
- ^ Brian Fox (2 March 1990). "Availability of bash 1.05". Newsgroup: gnu.bash.bug. Archived from the original on 10 November 2012. Retrieved 30 October 2010.
- ^
Bresnahan, Christine; Blum, Richard (April 2015). CompTIA Linux+ Powered by Linux Professional Institute Study Guide: Exam LX0-103 and Exam LX0-104 (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 5. ISBN 978-1-119-02122-3. Archived from the original on 2 March 2021. Retrieved 6 June 2016.
In Linux, most users run bash because it is the most popular shell.
- ^
Danesh, Arman; Jang, Michael (February 2006). Mastering Linux. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 363. ISBN 978-0-7821-5277-7. Archived from the original on 2 March 2021. Retrieved 6 June 2016.
The Bourne Again Shell (bash) is the most common shell installed with Linux distributions.
- ^ a b Portable Character Set
- ^ a b c Debian, Shell
- ^ a b "A desktop alternative". Forbes.
- ^ "Appendix A: Using the BeOS Command Line Shell". testou.free.fr.
- ^ a b Single UNIX Specification v 3 - Overview
- ^ "Terminal".
- ^ Essential Mac OS S Panther Server Adminstration, pg. 189
- ^ a b c POSIX FAQ v 1.18
- ^ POSIX-2004
- ^ POSIX-2013
- ^ POSIX-2016
- ^ "Missing source code - GPL compliance? · Issue #107 · Microsoft/WSL". GitHub. Archived from the original on 24 September 2019. Retrieved 8 July 2016.
- ^ "GNU Bash". Softpedia. SoftNews. 23 January 2010. Archived from the original on 21 October 2017. Retrieved 9 April 2016.
- ^ "Compatibility Subsystems". Archived from the original on 23 September 2020. Retrieved 4 September 2020.
- ^ POSIX-2018
- ^ a b scriptingosx.com, Moving to Zsh
- ^
Foster-Johnson, Eric; Welch, John C.; Anderson, Micah (April 2005). Beginning Shell Scripting. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 6. ISBN 978-0-7645-9791-6. Archived from the original on 2 March 2021. Retrieved 6 June 2016.
Bash is by far the most popular shell and forms the default shell on Linux and Mac OSX systems.
- ^ "Use zsh as the default shell on your Mac - Apple Support". Archived from the original on 2 December 2019. Retrieved 1 July 2019.
- ^ a b Warren, Tom (4 June 2019). "Apple replaces bash with zsh as the default shell in macOS Catalina". The Verge. Archived from the original on 10 June 2019. Retrieved 13 June 2019.
- ^ [1]
- ^ "Command Execution Environment (Bash Reference Manual)". www.gnu.org.
- ^ "Brace Expansion (Bash Reference Manual)". www.gnu.org. Archived from the original on 15 March 2018. Retrieved 10 January 2024.
- ^ {{ cite web bash.html#Programmable-Completion | title = Bash Reference Manual | url = https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/ }} | website = www.gnu.org
- ^ "Debugging Bash scripts". tldp.org. Archived from the original on 4 November 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
- ^ "The Set Builtin (Bash Reference Manual)". www.gnu.org. Retrieved 10 January 2024.
- ^ "Bash changes [Bash Hackers Wiki (DEV 20200708T2203)]". wiki-dev.bash-hackers.org. Archived from the original on 23 September 2019. Retrieved 23 September 2019.
- ^ "Bourne Shell Builtins (Bash Reference Manual)". www.gnu.org. Retrieved 10 January 2024.
- ^ "Bash Reference Manual". www.gnu.org. Archived from the original on 15 September 2019. Retrieved 15 September 2019.
- ^ "Working more productively with bash 2.x/3.x". www.caliban.org. Archived from the original on 29 June 2018. Retrieved 21 June 2018.
- ^ "6.11 Bash POSIX Mode", The GNU Bash Reference Manual, for Bash, Version 4.1, 23 December 2009, archived from the original on 3 December 2010, retrieved 26 October 2010
- ^ "Advanced Bash-Scripting Guide". www.tldp.org. Section 37.2 (Bash, version 3). Archived from the original on 5 May 2017. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
- ^ "Bash, version 4". tldp.org. Archived from the original on 1 July 2018. Retrieved 25 June 2018.
- ^ a b c "BashFAQ/061 - Greg's Wiki". mywiki.wooledge.org. Archived from the original on 2 March 2021. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
- ^ "Arrays (Bash Reference Manual)". www.gnu.org. Archived from the original on 11 July 2018. Retrieved 4 July 2018.
- ^ "macos - Update bash to version 4.0 on OSX". Ask Different. Archived from the original on 25 June 2018. Retrieved 25 June 2018.
- ^ a b Hughes, Matthew (4 June 2019). "Why does macOS Catalina use Zsh instead of Bash? Licensing". The Next Web. Archived from the original on 31 December 2020. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
- ^ a b Mendel Cooper. "Portability Issues". The Linux Documentation Project. ibiblio.org. Archived from the original on 27 January 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2012.
- ^ a b "10. Files". Debian Policy Manual v4.5.0.2. Archived from the original on 12 May 2020. Retrieved 11 May 2020.
- ^ "How To Format Date And Time In Linux, MacOS, And Bash?". Shell Tips!. Archived from the original on 3 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
- ^ a b Linux General Commands Manual –
- ^ a b Linux General Commands Manual –
- ^ "Portable Shell". Autoconf. Archived from the original on 2 March 2021. Retrieved 20 January 2020.
- ^ "BASH Help - A Bash Tutorial". Hypexr.org. 5 October 2012. Archived from the original on 2 March 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2013.
- ^ "Bash Reference Manual". www.gnu.org. Archived from the original on 15 March 2018. Retrieved 27 March 2018.
- ^ "Bash Reference Manual". tiswww.case.edu.
- ^ "Working more productively with bash 2.x/3.x". www.caliban.org. Archived from the original on 29 June 2018. Retrieved 21 June 2018.
- ^ "Index of /gnu/bash". ftp.swin.edu.au. Archived from the original on 8 March 2020. Retrieved 15 September 2019.
- ^ a b "An Introduction to Programmable Completion". tldp.org. Retrieved 21 January 2022.
- ^ "The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 7, 2018 edition". pubs.opengroup.org.
- ^ "BASH(1) Manual Page". tiswww.case.edu.
- ^ "bash.0\doc - bash.git - bash". git.savannah.gnu.org.
- ^ a b c "Bash - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation". www.gnu.org. Retrieved 10 January 2024.
- ^ "The GNU Bourne-Again Shell". tiswww.case.edu.
- ^ "Frequently Asked Questions".
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 3.5.3 Shell Parameter Expansion
- ^ bash(1), Parameter Expansion
- ^ POSIX 2024, 2.6.2 Parameter Expansion
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 3.4.2 Special Parameters
- ^ POSIX 2024, 2.5.2 Special Parameters
- ^ a b GNU Bash Manual, 4.3.1 The Set Builtin
- ^ a b c d e bash(1), SHELL BUILTIN COMMANDS
- ^ a b POSIX 2024, set
- ^ a b GNU Bash Manual, 4.1 Bourne Shell Builtins: trap
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 5.2 Bash Variables
- ^ bash(1): Shell Variables
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 5.2 Bash Variables: BASHPID
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 5.2 Bash Variables: BASH_ARGC
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 5.2 Bash Variables: BASH_ARGV
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 5.2 Bash Variables: BASH_LINENO
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 5.2 Bash Variables: BASH_REMATCH
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 5.2 Bash Variables: BASH_SOURCE
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 5.2 Bash Variables: BASH_XTRACEFD
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 5.2 Bash Variables: EPOCHREALTIME
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 5.2 Bash Variables: FUNCNAME
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 5.2 Bash Variables: LINENO
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 5.2 Bash Variables: PIPESTATUS
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 5.2 Bash Variables: PPID
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 5.2 Bash Variables: PS4
- ^ GNU Bash Manual, 4.3.2 The Shopt Builtin
- ^ ShellCheck: Shell script analysis tool
- ^ Github: shellcheck
- ^ Package: devscripts: scripts to make the life of a Debian Package maintainer easier
- ^ Kcov - code coverage
- ^ Debugging with the BASH debugger
- ^ Documentation of Project's Homepage: "[Bashdb-devel Re: [PATCH] fix bashdb script handling of tmp directory"]
- ^ Juliana, Cino (10 June 2017). "Linux bash exit status and how to set exit status in bash - Techolac". Archived from the original on 21 June 2019. Retrieved 21 June 2019.
- ^ Leyden, John (24 September 2014). "Patch Bash NOW: 'Shell Shock' bug blasts OS X, Linux systems wide open". The Register. Archived from the original on 16 October 2014. Retrieved 25 September 2014.
- ^ Perlroth, Nicole (25 September 2014). "Security Experts Expect 'Shellshock' Software Bug in Bash to Be Significant". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 5 April 2019. Retrieved 25 September 2014.
- ^ Seltzer, Larry (29 September 2014). "Shellshock makes Heartbleed look insignificant". ZDNet. Archived from the original on 14 May 2016.
- ^ Huzaifa Sidhpurwala (24 September 2014). "Bash specially-crafted environment variables code injection attack". Red Hat. Archived from the original on 25 September 2014. Retrieved 25 September 2014.
- ^ Chazelas, Stephane (4 October 2014). "oss-sec mailing list archives". Seclists.org. Archived from the original on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 4 October 2014.
- ^ bashbug(1) Archived October 2, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, die.net
- ^ "Linux / Unix Command: bashbug" Archived October 6, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, apple.com
- ^ "How to install Bash shell command-line tool on Windows 10". 28 September 2016. Archived from the original on 20 November 2016. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
- ^ Hoffman, Chris (30 July 2021). "How to Install the Windows Subsystem for Linux on Windows 11". How-To Geek. Retrieved 12 October 2022.
- ^ "User Environment Feature Changes". Oracle. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
- ^ "github version history NEWS v5.0". GitHub. Archived from the original on 4 May 2022. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
- ^ "Bash changes [Bash Hackers Wiki]". Archived from the original on 18 March 2020. Retrieved 25 November 2019.
- ^ "Bash-5.0 release available". lists.gnu.org. Archived from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
- ^
GNU Project. "README file". Archived from the original on 26 April 2019. Retrieved 16 April 2014.
Bash is free software, distributed under the terms of the [GNU] General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, version 3 of the License (or any later version).
- ^
"bash-1.11". oldlinux.org. Archived from the original on 15 October 2021. Retrieved 9 June 2021.
See test.c for GPL-2.0-or-later
- ^ "bash-1.05.tar". oldlinux.org.
- ^ "Is there a way to download the presumably initial bash source bash-0.99?". unix.stackexchange.com.
- ^ "Definition of BORN-AGAIN". www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 9 January 2024.
- ^ "What is Bash? (Bash Reference Manual)". www.gnu.org. Retrieved 9 January 2024.
- ^ "Definition of BASH". www.merriam-webster.com. 5 January 2024. Retrieved 9 January 2024.
- ^ "Irony Definition, Common Examples, and Significance in Literature". 31 August 2020.
- ^ "Innuendo - Examples and Definition of Innuendo". 2 January 2014.
- ^ "BashGuide/Arrays - Greg's Wiki". mywiki.wooledge.org. Retrieved 10 January 2024.
- ^ "CommandSubstitution - Greg's Wiki". mywiki.wooledge.org. Retrieved 10 January 2024.
- ^ "BashGuide/TestsAndConditionals - Greg's Wiki". mywiki.wooledge.org. Retrieved 10 January 2024.
- ^ "CHANGES - bash.git - bash". git.savannah.gnu.org. Retrieved 10 January 2024.
- ^ "Bash changes [Bash Hackers Wiki]". 14 February 2021. Archived from the original on 14 February 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2024.
- ^ "Obsolete and deprecated syntax [Bash Hackers Wiki]". 11 February 2021. Archived from the original on 11 February 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2024.
- ^ Arch Linux, Command-line shell
Further reading
[edit]- Stephenson, Neal (2003). In the Beginning... Was the Command Line. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0380815937.
- "Evolution of shells in Linux". ibm.com. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
- "Scripting Reference :: Scripting with the Bourne-Again Shell (Bash)". berkeley.edu. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
- "IRIS :: Instructional & Research Information Systems :: FAQ: Unix :: About UNIX Shells". berkeley.edu. Retrieved 19 May 2024.